Investigate inside the mission boundary
Keep packet storage, deterministic processing, model routing, evidence review, and reporting within the approved deployment profile.
Enterprise packet investigation · Defense and public sector
Investigate sensitive traffic inside the boundary.
Combine deterministic packet processing, offline security evidence, local-model investigation, explicit coverage, and defensible reporting for disconnected or controlled environments—subject to deployment qualification.
01Private PCAPstorage · access
02Core Enginedecode · detect
03Local AIqualified route
04Evidencereview · report
Required proof
Connected and disconnected acceptance must verify authentication, processing, inference, reporting, updates, and explicit failure—not infer air-gap readiness from hosted success.
Security and availability
Protect the mission. Preserve the evidence.
PacketSafari complements live monitoring and endpoint controls. It investigates captured traffic after an alert, outage, exercise, or escalation.
Find unknown malicious activity
Combine Suricata-compatible signatures, behavioral C2, DNS tunnels, covert channels, aggregate scans, and configured offline intelligence.
Reconstruct lateral attack paths
Correlate east-west traffic, Active Directory, Kerberos, LDAP, SMB, RDP, remote administration, and proxy pivots with exact packet evidence.
Restore mission and public services
Separate transport, DNS, TLS, VPN, middlebox, service, and receiver failure without turning missing evidence into a clean conclusion.
Simple value estimate
What could faster evidence be worth?
Use three planning assumptions. Count only incidents where packet investigation is part of the response and only hours you genuinely believe better evidence could remove.
Annual modeled valueIncidents × hours potentially saved × cost or exposure per hour
Hours potentially recovered144 / year
Modeled annual value€1,728,000
Illustrative planning estimate—not a PacketSafari guarantee or customer result. Validate time saved and business impact during an evaluation.
Technical investigation surfaces
Security depth without hidden coverage gaps.
Exact protocol and detector depth is agreed from approved captures. Encrypted, unsupported, unavailable, and partial evidence remains explicit.
Identity and administrative paths
Directory services · privileged access · remote administration · internal servicesKerberos · LDAP · SMB · RDP · DNS · SSHInvestigate suspicious authentication, lateral movement, proxy attack paths, remote access, and east-west relationships.
Mission and public-service availability
Service edge · VPN · proxies · load balancers · applications · inter-site linksTCP · UDP · TLS · DNS · IPsec/GRE visibility · ICMPLocalize resets, loss, reordering, path policy, encrypted-session failure, and unavailable dependencies.
Offline security evidence
Disconnected enclave · analysis workstation · security operations · evidence reviewSignatures · behavioral C2 · tunnels · scans/floods · threat-intelligence matchingPreserve source, coverage, confidence, uncertainty, and packet pivots even when Internet services are unavailable.
Sensitive and specialist protocols
Purpose-built platforms · infrastructure · communications · operational environmentsCapture-specific decoded fields and protocol specialistsQualify depth with approved representative captures; unsupported or partial evidence remains explicit.
Procurement and acceptance
Turn “on-prem” into testable controls.
A deployment diagram is not an accreditation result. Make each boundary and failure mode observable during acceptance.
- 01
Demonstrate that normal investigation, authentication, reporting, and selected AI routes require no unapproved external service.
- 02
Document packet storage, retention, identity, authorization, audit, model routing, and egress boundaries.
- 03
Verify local-model compatibility, evidence quality, throughput, concurrency, and failure behavior on the accepted infrastructure.
- 04
Exercise offline signature and threat-intelligence import, provenance, rollback, and stale-content visibility where included in scope.
- 05
Confirm Preliminary, Verification, Final Report, partial coverage, unavailable evidence, and failed processing remain distinguishable.
- 06
Run acceptance against approved representative captures and record supported protocols, capacity, recovery, and operational ownership.
Assurance context
NIST CSF 2.0
A common language for governing, identifying, protecting, detecting, responding to, and recovering from cybersecurity risk.
NIST CSF 2.0NIST incident response guidance
SP 800-61 Rev. 3 integrates incident response across cybersecurity risk management and emphasizes effective detection, response, and recovery.
NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3Organization-specific accreditation
Data classification, sovereignty, cryptography, supply chain, logging, updates, support, and acceptance must be mapped to the buyer’s authority and jurisdiction.
Qualify during procurementPacketSafari supplies technical investigation evidence; it does not grant accreditation, certify a framework, or determine whether a deployment is suitable for classified information.
Qualify before committing